Fact File:
Charles Alexander John Alexander
Claim Number: 742 Claim Number: 743
Compensation: £34 8S 0D Compensation: £34 8S 0D
Number of Enslaved in Claim: 1 Number of Enslaved in Claim: 1
Parish: St Patrick Parish: St Patrick
Parliamentary Papers: p. 99 Parliamentary Papers: p.99
Life dates: 1802-1861 Life dates: 1798-1840
Charles was born on 5th December 1802 into a long-established Scottish family from the historic county of Banffshire which is now split between Aberdeenshire and Moray council areas.
He was the eldest son of Charles ALEXANDER (1761-1845) and grandson of Charles ALEXANDER (1717–1787) who fought alongside Bonnie Prince Charlie during the Jacobite uprising of 1745 and a descendant of the original "Lord of Lochaber", Alexander (or Alastair Carrach) MacAlister who was a member of the Clan Donald and a prominent Highland figure. Alastair’s descendants adopted the surname "Alexander," eventually becoming a distinct branch of Clan Donald. This lineage includes the Alexanders of Inverkeithny.
The Lordship of Lochaber was known for its warrior legacy, including Alastair's reputed invention of the Lochaber axe, a weapon used in Scottish battles during that period.
After the defeat at the Battle of Culloden in 1746, many Highland families, including the Alexanders, experienced significant political and economic upheaval. The Alexanders faced severe financial hardships as a consequence.
Grenada
As a result of these hardships Charles migrated to Grenada around 1838 with his brothers, Richardson and Hall, in an effort to restore the family's financial stability. Even though this was the year of emancipation, he had enslaved people previously as an absentee landlord. He had 2 other brothers Thomas and John who both died in Grenada; Thomas on 6th Mar 1819 (age 18) and John 1840 (age 42). Their uncle Thomas Thain's involvement with the North West Company of Canada may have influenced their decision to pursue opportunities in the Caribbean.
Settling in Grenada, Charles became a successful plantation owner but he had arrived at a time after emancipation where workers started to assert their rights and demand better treatment, conditions and pay and this applied to the “liberated Africans” who were brought to Grenada after emancipation.
Charles organised a substantial militia drawn from the planter community to subdue such protestations from the liberated Africans. He personally commanded this unit and was credited with restoring stability during what was described as a period of threatened disturbance.
This was a significant development because it marked a clear transition from slavery to post-emancipation control, rather than a break with the past. It reflected deep planter anxiety about maintaining order in a society where formerly coerced labour was no longer legally enslaved but still expected to remain disciplined and compliant.
The resistance of the “liberated Africans” was perceived by colonial elites as a threat to economic stability and social hierarchy. By organising a militia drawn from the planter class and personally commanding it, Charles Alexander positioned himself as a defender of colonial authority at a moment when the old mechanisms of control had weakened.
In recognition of these services, Queen Victoria granted him a Colonel’s commission, a significant honour for a colonial resident and indicative of his standing within Grenadian society. He shortly afterwards became a member of the Executive Council placing him at the centre of colonial governance during a turbulent era that included the aftermath of emancipation and evolving economic pressures across the Caribbean. It demonstrated how men already embedded in slavery and slave management could reinvent themselves as guardians of peace and governance, preserving their influence and status in the new era.
Charles and his brothers frequently returned to Scotland, keeping close ties to the old home. After their father’s death in 1845, Charles acquired Don Bank Cottage near the mouth of the River Don in Old Aberdeen, where his mother Helen Thain lived until her death in 1858. Their father Charles ALEXANDER died at Auchininna at age 84, ending over 200 years of family residency.
Compensation Claims
Charles made a claim for just one enslaved person with compensation awarded of £34 8s 0d. His brother John was awarded an identical amount for the one person he had enslaved.
It would appear that Charles later acquired the Montreuil estate as it was left in trust for his son Douglas after he died. They also acquired the neighbouring estate at Springbank.
Montreuil estate was later overseen by family member Arthur Henry Beckles Gall. Over time, ownership of the estate became fragmented among Charles ALEXANDER’s descendants. By the mid-1960s, few family members still lived in Grenada, and ownership was divided among 22 descendants, only six retaining the Alexander surname.
In 1967, the estate was producing cocoa, nutmeg, mace, bananas, and other provisions, yielding an income of EC$49,986, though production and income declined by the early 1970s. Estate land had to be sold to cover operating costs, reducing the estate from about 300 acres in 1970 to 211 acres after selling over 89 acres.
Family
His personal life was equally rooted in networks that tied Scotland and the Caribbean together. On 15 December 1840 he married Margaret Drysdale Douglas, born in 1819, daughter of Andrew Douglas of Jedburgh and Berwick-upon-Tweed. The couple had eleven children; five sons and six daughters. Two of their sons died young, a common tragedy of the era. These included:
After Isabella died in 1853. Hall then married his second wife, Isabella Allen, on December 18, 1860. They had four daughters: Isabella Helen Alexander (born December 28, 1861) Edith Gertrude Allen Alexander (Dec 23, 1863 - May 15, 1865) Anne Millicent Alexander (born October 22, 1865) Alice Maude Alexander (born 1868)
Hall died on April 13, 1868, without male issue. His second wife, Isabella Allen, and their family resided in Folkstone.
The Enslaved

Fanny (1802 -)
Fanny first appeared in the Slave Register of 1817. She was one of the 24 enslaved people at the Good Hope Estate, Petit Martinique (listed under St George in the Slave Register) under the control of James Smith. She was 14 at the time and born enslaved.

James sold her in isolation in 1820 to John Alexander. She was separated from the wider group with whom she had lived and worked. This isolated sale suggests no consideration was given to kinship, familiarity or stability. She was cut adrift from everyone she had grown up with.


By 1829, Fanny had been moved once more, this time from St George to St Patrick. Although John Alexander remained the legal owner, day-to-day control passed to his brother, Charles Alexander, who acted as his attorney on the island. This shift, recorded formally in the slave registers, highlights how Fanny’s life was governed by decisions made by others, often for administrative convenience, with no reference to her wishes or wellbeing. Movement between parishes meant adapting again to new routines, terrain and expectations.

Fanny stayed in this setting right up to abolition where she would then have entered the apprenticeship scheme before her eventual release in 1838. She would have been about 35/36 years old at emancipation and could finally have some choice as to how to live the rest of her life. She was the one enslaved person that John Alexander claimed compensation for.

Alexander and Sarah
Sarah and Alexander were born enslaved on Woodhall Estate in St George, Grenada, into a family whose bonds were repeatedly broken by sale and transfer. Their earliest appearances in the colonial records already reveal how fragile family life was under slavery, even for very young children.
Sarah first appears in the 1821 Slave Register at just two years old, recorded under the control of Delia Cockburn, a free-coloured woman who herself occupied a complex position within Grenadian society. Delia had a daughter, Elizabeth Cockburn, with Alexander Cockburn, a Scottish man and son of Walter Cockburn. Elizabeth was later formally acknowledged in her father’s will. Despite Delia’s free status and her proximity to white Scottish networks, the people she enslaved remained subject to sale, separation and exploitation.

By 1825, the registers show that Alexander, aged nine, was also enslaved on Woodhall Estate under Delia’s control.

In 1831, when Sarah was about fourteen and Alexander around twelve, Delia Cockburn sold both children to Charles Alexander. This sale formally severed them from the people they grew up with at the Woodhall Estate.


In Charles Annual Return, it is clear that Alexander and Sarah were indeed siblings. Their mother, Angelique, was herself born enslaved in Grenada in 1791. The earliest surviving register for Angelique dates from 1821, where she is described as having “the 3 first toes of the right foot cut off” which may have resulted from a work related accident from an agricultural tool. Angelique was, consequently, separated from her children and she remained with Delia right up to 1834.

The family unit was broken again when Alexander was 16 in 1832 as Charles sold him to Robert Walker.

…and then Sarah was sold the following year to the Chambord Estate, compounding the family’s dispersal. By this point, Angelique had been separated from both children, and Sarah and Alexander were separated from each other, each forced into a different enslaving environment, routine, and future.

By the mid-1830s, the legal structure that had governed and fractured Angelique’s family for decades collapsed following abolition and emancipation. Although slavery formally ended in 1834, Angelique, Sarah and Alexander, like thousands of others, were forced into the apprenticeship system, a final attempt to preserve control over their labour. Yet the direction of travel had changed, and for the first time the future was no longer entirely dictated by sale and transfer.
For Angelique, born enslaved in 1791, survival itself was an act of endurance. She had lived through injury, separation and loss, yet remained alive into the final years of slavery. When emancipation arrived in 1838, she was in her late forties. This was an age at which many formerly enslaved women sought to rebuild family networks, form households of their own choosing, or remain within familiar communities where mutual support mattered more than ownership ever had. Even if she did not reunite physically with her children, emancipation removed the legal power that had once allowed others to sell her, punish her body, or define her existence as property.
For Alexander, sold away from his family at sixteen, freedom arrived at a pivotal moment. Emancipation meant that he entered adulthood no longer as a transferable asset, but as a man able, however constrained by poverty and racial hierarchy, to decide where to work, whom to associate with, and how to name himself. Many young men of his generation moved into skilled labour, maritime work, or small-scale agriculture. The right to remain with his family had been denied to him in childhood but this was replaced by the possibility of forming one of his own and perhaps reuniting with his sister and mother.
For Sarah, freedom came in her early twenties. Having endured repeated sales as a child and adolescent, emancipation offered something she had never known: stability that could not be undone by a signature or a ledger entry. Like many formerly enslaved women, she may have sought out family connections, chosen paid domestic work, cultivated provision grounds, or established an independent household. The choices available to her were limited, but they were hers in a way they had never been before.
What is most important is this: the system that broke Angelique’s family could no longer break it again. Whatever paths Sarah, Alexander and Angelique took after 1838, they did so as free people under the law. Their names ceased to appear in slave registers, sales columns and ownership returns, not because they vanished, but because the records that once reduced them to property lost their power.
In that silence of the archive lies a different kind of presence: the possibility that, after decades of enforced separation, labour and loss, Angelique, Sarah and Alexander finally lived lives shaped by survival, resilience and choice.
Betsey
As Sarah was being sold to the Chambord Estate, Charles Alexander bought Betsey, age 32, from the same estate that year (1933). Betsey was effectively separated from her mother Jeanne.

She first appeared in the 1817 slave Register under the control of Walter Cockburn with Owsley Rowley acting as his attorney (Walter likely to have been the same Walter Cockburn mentioned earlier and residing in Scotland). She was described as being a mulatto born in Grenada.

Betsey remained with Charles until slavery was abolished and likely stayed on through the apprenticeship and then emancipation. She was the one person that Charles claimed compensation for.

We are grateful to Dr. John Angus Martin of the Grenada Genealogical and Historical Society Facebook group for his editorial support.
The ALEXANDERS of INVERKEITHNY LOCHABER and CLAN DONALD©, Compiled by Robert Alexander, 1926, Updated by Michael Outram, starting 1984 https://freepages.rootsweb.com/~ocarroll/genealogy/alex.htm
William Alexander (judge) - Wikipedia www.ucl.ac.uk/lbs/person/view/45714
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/lbs/person/view/10515
Delia Cockburn https://www.ucl.ac.uk/lbs/person/view/10666